Kennedy, Johnson, Schwab & Roberge, P.C.

History and stated role

Kennedy, Johnson, Schwab & Roberge, P.C. dates to 1988. The firm says it began with a focus on representing injured people throughout Connecticut. Its work has covered personal injury, medical malpractice and workers' compensation matters since that year.

The website places the firm on the plaintiff side of civil cases. Its attorneys litigate in Connecticut state and federal courts. The firm also accepts referrals and co-counsel matters from lawyers across the state, which gives referring counsel a stated route for sharing responsibility in suitable cases.

As a reviewer, I see the clearest theme in the firm's long focus on injury claims. The listed fields involve harm tied to vehicles, medical care, property conditions, products and workplaces. Each field requires its own evidence, yet all place close attention on causation and the effect of an injury.

Focus and practice areas

The website identifies a wide set of plaintiff matters within the firm's injury work. It names car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian accidents. It also identifies medical malpractice, wrongful death, product liability, premises liability, construction accidents and workplace injuries.

Vehicle collision claims

Car accident matters commonly require police reports, photographs, medical records and witness accounts. The parties may dispute fault, the cause of the injuries or the amount of loss. Insurance records can also affect how the claim proceeds and which sources of coverage apply.

Truck accident cases can involve records beyond those found in a typical passenger vehicle claim. Driver logs, carrier files, inspection records and maintenance material may help explain what happened. The legal work may also require attention to the conduct of both a driver and a trucking company.

Motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian cases raise their own factual questions. Sight lines, road design, traffic signals, vehicle speed and witness observations may shape the analysis. Medical evidence then connects the incident with the injuries claimed.

Medical malpractice claims

Medical malpractice cases usually begin with a close review of treatment records. The claimant's legal team builds a chronology and studies the care at issue. Questions about the standard of care and medical causation often require input from qualified medical professionals.

These cases can turn on small details in charts, test results, imaging and treatment decisions. Depositions may examine what each provider knew and when that person knew it. Expert opinions can address whether the care met the relevant standard and whether a departure caused harm.

Other injury matters

The firm's stated work also covers wrongful death. In general, these claims address a death allegedly caused by another party's conduct. The personal representative, family relationships, financial records and evidence about the deceased person's life may all affect the case.

Product liability cases examine a product, its design, its manufacture or the warnings that accompanied it. Preserving the item can be central because later inspection may help identify a defect. Purchase records, instructions, photographs and prior repair material can add context.

Premises liability claims focus on a property condition and the responsibilities of people who controlled the site. Relevant evidence may include photographs, maintenance logs, inspection records and witness statements. Timing matters because parties often dispute when a condition arose and who knew about it.

Workplace, abuse and care-related claims

Construction accidents and other workplace injuries appear among the matters listed by the firm. Workers' compensation can address injuries tied to employment, while some incidents may also raise claims involving contractors, property owners or equipment makers. The facts and the legal relationship between the parties determine which routes apply.

A workplace file often draws on incident reports, medical records, employment documents and safety material. Construction matters may require contracts, site records, photographs and information about who controlled the work. An injured worker's duties and the role of each company can shape the legal analysis.

Sexual abuse and nursing home matters

The website identifies sexual abuse claims and nursing home abuse or neglect among the firm's fields. These matters can involve medical records, facility records, reports, witness accounts and evidence about supervision. The identity of the responsible person or entity may require careful factual review.

Nursing home claims may involve care plans, medication records, staffing documents and communications with family members. The central questions depend on the alleged event and the resident's condition. A clear timeline can help connect reported harm with particular acts or lapses in care.

Sexual abuse cases can call for sensitive handling of personal accounts and supporting records. Civil proceedings may examine the alleged conduct and the responsibilities of other parties connected with the setting. Privacy concerns can also shape how counsel gathers, stores and presents evidence.

How the team is built

The website names eight attorneys, and each holds a partner title. John Kennedy Jr. is identified as the founding partner. The roster identifies Stephanie Z. Roberge, Robert L. Schwab, Louis A. Annecchino, Brendan K. Nelligan, Michael Kennedy, Patrick Kennedy and Isabelle L. Koch as partners.

That roster gives visitors a direct view of the firm's named lawyers and its leadership structure. The founding partner designation also connects John Kennedy Jr. with the firm's origins. The other seven names appear at the same partner level on the supplied roster.

A partner roster of this kind can matter in injury litigation because cases may require decisions about investigation, experts, discovery and trial preparation. Co-counsel work can also require clear lines of responsibility between firms. The website expressly states that the attorneys accept both referral and co-counsel matters from Connecticut lawyers.

Litigation and case development

The firm's stated court work includes plaintiff cases in Connecticut state and federal courts. Civil litigation usually begins with factual review and a decision about the proper claims and parties. Counsel may then prepare pleadings, exchange written discovery, take depositions and address motions.

Expert evidence can carry special weight in medical malpractice, product liability and some serious injury cases. A lawyer may need to coordinate medical opinions, technical analysis or economic evidence. Courts set deadlines for those disclosures, and the parties test the opinions through depositions and motions.

Settlement discussions can occur at several points in a civil case. The available records, expert opinions and testimony affect how each side assesses risk. If the parties do not resolve the dispute, the court process can continue through trial and any permitted post-trial proceedings.

Referral and co-counsel arrangements can fit cases that need added litigation resources or experience in a particular claim type. The referring lawyer and trial counsel usually define their roles, communication duties and responsibility for the file. The firm's website states that it works with lawyers throughout Connecticut on those arrangements.

Geographic reach and public presence

The firm describes its client base in statewide terms. Its listed offices give it a presence in different parts of Connecticut. New Haven is the first location presented on the website, with Norwalk and West Hartford also named.

This location pattern supports access through three Connecticut cities. It also aligns with the firm's statement that it represents injured people throughout the state. Court venue, the location of an incident and the residence of the parties can affect where a case proceeds.

The firm's site connects its history, attorney roster and practice pages in a direct way. Visitors can identify the named partners and review the types of injury claims the firm lists. The organization record also links the firm with Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and X.

Courts and venues in Connecticut

Connecticut runs its trial-level civil cases through the Superior Court, which sits in judicial districts spread across the state. New Haven is one of those district seats, and a court there handles matters from the city and the towns around it. A plaintiff who seeks money damages for a personal injury usually brings that claim in the Superior Court.

Within the Superior Court, a civil injury suit moves along a docket that the court manages toward settlement or trial. Larger or document-heavy matters can draw closer case management from the bench. Because the system is built on judicial districts, a suit connected to New Haven generally stays within that district unless a party shows a sound reason to move it elsewhere.

Federal claims follow a separate path. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut hears civil cases from a single statewide district and sits in New Haven and other Connecticut cities. An injury matter can land in that court when the parties come from different states or when a federal question drives the claim. Work of this kind asks counsel to know the rules and schedules that each system sets.

Establishing losses in a serious injury case

Injury litigation weighs both fault and the value of the harm. A claimant's team gathers medical bills and records of treatment, along with proof of time missed from work. These documents form the base for a demand and, if the case continues, for what a jury may consider.

Serious cases often reach beyond current bills. A life-care plan can set out future medical needs, and an economist may calculate lost earning capacity when an injury limits a person's ability to work. Testimony from treating providers and from the injured person can describe the pain an injury causes and the way it reshapes daily life.

Claims that involve catastrophic injury, such as harm from a major collision or a medical error, can leave a person with permanent conditions. Valuing that kind of loss calls for careful proof about both the past and the years ahead. A defense team tests each figure, so the strength of the medical and financial record often shapes how the case resolves.