Skip to content

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Bloomfield Hills, MI Courts in Michigan

Is this your firm?

Claim the listing to manage your profile and start earning the VERIFIED badge.

Claim this listing →

VerifiedLawFirms editorial: Corporate focus across Michigan — The public site reports a team of more than 230 attorneys. Warner Norcross + Judd LLP operates nine offices across Michigan.

Each row is a check on this listing. Document checks are reviewed by an editor from evidence the firm submitted and are dated by that review; automatic checks confirm the listing's contact details are present and correctly formatted. Verification is independent of membership tier.

What we verifiedHow we verifiedStatusLast checked
Email address Automatically Confirmed 2026-07-28
Address Automatically Confirmed 2026-07-28
Phone number Automatically Confirmed 2026-07-28

Automatic checks confirm the listing's contact details are present and correctly formatted. They do not verify the firm's licensure or standing — those are the document checks an editor reviews. How we verify →

About Warner Norcross + Judd

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm based in Michigan. The firm reports more than 230 attorneys working from nine offices across the state. According to its own published description, the firm works in virtually all areas of business law.

The nine Michigan offices are located in Bloomfield Hills, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Holland, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Macomb County, Midland, and Muskegon. The Bloomfield Hills office is at 40701 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304-5078. Nazli G. Sater serves as the executive partner and primary contact for that office.

The main firm phone number listed on the site is 616.752.2000, and the general email address is info@wnj.com. The firm describes itself as a law firm in Michigan, with a focus on business and corporate legal work for clients throughout the state. The site does not state a founding year, and it does not list specific practice areas beyond its general business law focus.

Editor's Review

VerifiedLawFirms editorial

Corporate focus across Michigan

The public site reports a team of more than 230 attorneys. Warner Norcross + Judd LLP operates nine offices across Michigan. Its organization description says the firm works in virtually all areas of business law.

The office list names Bloomfield Hills, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Holland, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Macomb County, Midland and Muskegon. These locations give prospective clients several points of contact within the state. In my opinion, the named cities offer a clear basis for judging geographic fit.

At Bloomfield Hills, the site names Nazli G. Sater as executive partner and primary contact. Her stated roles connect office leadership with a specific attorney. A business approaching that location can identify the published contact responsible for the office.

How a business law matter usually starts

Company leaders first need to identify the legal question, the business goal, the decision maker and any deadline. Counsel also needs the relevant history and the names of other parties. These details shape the initial legal review.

Counsel ordinarily confirms the identity of the client and checks for conflicts before receiving sensitive details. For a company, the client may be the entity even when an owner or officer starts the conversation. Clear identification helps everyone understand who will receive the legal advice.

Setting the scope

The initial written scope can name the question, the responsible lawyers and the expected work product. It can also set a communication path and identify the people who may approve key choices. A defined scope gives both sides a common record of the assignment.

A matter can change when new facts appear or the company changes its plans. Counsel and the client can record any added work and identify new decision points. This keeps the legal task tied to the current business objective.

Documents for the first review

Formation records, current contracts, notices, correspondence and earlier company decisions often supply the starting facts. A short chronology can connect those records to relevant dates. The client can mark missing documents and identify the person who holds each record.

Lawyers then separate confirmed facts, open questions and assumptions that need testing. They may ask who signed a document, who approved a decision or when another party received notice. A written request list helps the company gather answers in an orderly way.

Authority, drafting and approval

In business law generally, articles, bylaws, operating agreements and resolutions can determine who has authority to act. Counsel compares the planned action with those governing records. The approval route depends on the entity and the decision under review.

Contract work commonly involves drafts, redlines, schedules, exhibits and signature copies. Lawyers track proposed language and explain the legal effect of key changes. Business leaders decide whether the commercial terms meet the company's goals.

The record of a decision

Minutes and written consents can record who approved an action and when approval occurred. The record should identify the document or transaction at issue. It should also match the authority stated in the company's governing materials.

For executed documents, names, titles, dates and versions require careful review. A clean final set helps the company know which terms control. Organized records also help later counsel understand the decision without rebuilding its history.

Diligence and factual checks

Some business matters require a closer review of contracts, ownership records, licenses, notices or pending obligations. Counsel may prepare questions for company officers and employees who know the underlying events. Each answer can point to another document or approval that needs review.

The legal analysis and the factual record have separate roles. Company personnel supply business facts, while counsel applies the relevant legal standards. Written assumptions allow the client to correct an error before it affects advice or drafting.

Some agreements create duties that continue after signature. Renewal dates, notice periods, approval rights and reporting duties may need calendar entries. The company can assign responsibility for each later action and retain the final documents with that schedule.

Coordinating work within a large firm

One responsible lawyer can maintain the schedule, collect questions and deliver advice in a consistent form. Other lawyers may address distinct legal issues when a matter calls for their input. The client should know who coordinates the work and who has authority to request decisions.

When attorneys in several offices participate, written assignments can show who handles each issue. A shared record of drafts, facts and decisions reduces confusion about the current version. Regular communication also keeps the company aware of upcoming choices.

Useful status updates

Each update can identify the issue under review, the available options and the person who must decide. It can also state the next required action and the relevant date. Short written updates create a record that company leaders can share with authorized participants.

New facts can change legal advice. The client should tell counsel when a transaction changes, a notice arrives or another party takes a new position. Counsel can then revise the analysis and identify any effect on pending decisions.

At the end of an assignment, counsel can deliver final documents and identify any remaining duties. The company can store the advice, approvals and signed materials with the appropriate corporate records. A closing record gives future decision makers the facts behind the completed work.

Questions that help test fit

A prospective client can ask which attorneys would handle the assignment and which office would coordinate it. The client can also ask how the team divides responsibility and who will communicate requested decisions. The answers help identify the working structure before legal analysis begins.

The firm's stated coverage of virtually all areas of business law invites a focused discussion about the exact issue. A company can describe the document, decision or event that created the need for counsel. It can then ask which lawyer would take responsibility for that work.

Published identity and channels

The site uses Warner Norcross + Judd LLP as the firm's legal name and wnj.com as its web address. The firm also publishes Facebook and LinkedIn pages as its listed social channels.

Client reviews

No client reviews yet.

Be the first to leave a review.

Write a review

Reviews are from clients of the firm. We email you a link to confirm, then an editor checks your review before it appears. Your email stays private.

Nazli G. Sater Executive Partner

Nazli G. Sater earned a Bachelor of Arts from Wayne State University in 1982 and a Juris Doctor from Wayne State University Law School in 1985. After graduation, she served a clerkship with a judge on the 6th Circuit Court in Oakland County. Her practice covers family law and divorce, including complex divorce cases, asset division, business valuation, custody, alimony, child support, and prenuptial and postnuptial agreements. She chairs the Family Law/Divorce Practice Group at Warner Norcross + Judd.

Contact Warner Norcross + Judd

Reach this firm directly using the details below. VerifiedLawFirms is a directory, not a referral service, so you contact the firm yourself and we never sit in between.

Website

www.wnj.com ↗

Address

40701 Woodward Avenue
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5078

Map of 40701 Woodward Avenue, Bloomfield Hills, MI (see the address above for a text alternative).