Bottar Law, PLLC

A plaintiff-side firm with an established New York presence

Bottar Law, PLLC traces its work for injured clients to 1983. The firm represents plaintiffs in New York and across the northeastern United States. Its stated focus is severe personal injury and medical negligence.

The firm is based in Fayetteville and also has an Albany satellite office available by appointment. This structure gives the firm a presence in Central New York and the state capital region. The website presents both locations as access points for the same plaintiff-side practice.

The firm's history gives prospective clients a clear sense of continuity. Its current attorney roster includes members, senior counsel and of counsel lawyers. The mix suggests a defined leadership structure with several levels of participation in the firm's work.

Focus and practice areas

The website names medical malpractice, birth injuries, brain and nerve injuries, workplace injuries, motor vehicle accidents, product liability, premises liability, toxic exposure and governmental negligence. Bottar Law also handles wrongful death claims tied to negligent conduct. These fields often involve serious physical harm, detailed records and disputes over legal responsibility.

Several listed areas overlap in a single event. A workplace injury may raise questions about a property owner, contractor, subcontractor or equipment manufacturer. A dangerous medication may involve product liability as well as medical evidence about the person's condition and treatment.

The practice also covers injuries connected to unsafe property conditions and public entities. Premises claims usually examine who controlled the location, what condition caused the injury and what notice the responsible party had. Governmental negligence claims can add special filing rules and shorter procedural deadlines under New York law.

Motor vehicle and severe injury claims

A motor vehicle claim often begins with the collision report, photographs, witness accounts, medical records and insurance information. The parties may dispute how the crash happened, whether each injury came from the crash and how the injuries affect daily life. New York's insurance rules can shape which benefits apply and whether an injured person may pursue a liability claim.

Brain, spinal and nerve injuries call for close attention to medical history and ongoing symptoms. Doctors may use imaging, neurological examinations and functional testing to assess the injury. Employment records and testimony from family members can help explain changes in work capacity or ordinary activities.

Severe injury cases may require evidence about future treatment, lost income and long-term assistance. Lawyers and insurers examine the connection between the event and each claimed loss. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute, a court may set deadlines for document exchange, sworn testimony, motions and trial preparation.

Workplace and premises matters

The firm's workplace injury description includes possible claims involving property owners, contractors, subcontractors and equipment manufacturers. That scope matters because an injured worker may have rights involving several parties. The facts may call for separate review of workplace benefits, site safety duties and responsibility for defective equipment.

Construction and workplace matters often depend on contracts, safety records, incident reports, photographs and witness testimony. The roles of the owner and each contractor can affect the legal analysis. Investigators may also examine who directed the work, supplied the equipment or controlled the area where the injury occurred.

Premises liability follows a related evidence path. The claimant usually needs to identify the dangerous condition and connect it to the injury. Maintenance records, inspection practices, video footage and prior complaints may help establish what the property owner or operator knew.

Medical negligence, products and toxic exposure

Medical malpractice claims usually ask whether a health care provider departed from accepted medical practice and caused an injury. Birth injury cases may require review of prenatal records, fetal monitoring, delivery decisions and newborn care. Other claims may concern diagnosis, surgery, medication or follow-up treatment.

Medical records form a large part of this work, but the chronology also matters. The parties examine symptoms, test results, treatment decisions and the timing of each event. Medical professionals may provide opinions about the standard of care, causation and the patient's likely future needs.

Product liability cases concern dangerous products and medications, according to the firm. These matters may focus on design, manufacturing, warnings or instructions. Useful materials can include product records, purchase information, packaging, testing documents and evidence about how the person used the item.

Toxic tort claims

Toxic exposure cases often require proof of the substance, the route of exposure and the duration of contact. Work history, property records, environmental testing and medical records may all affect the inquiry. The claimant must usually connect the exposure to a diagnosed condition through reliable scientific and medical evidence.

These claims can involve events that occurred years before symptoms appeared. A careful timeline helps identify locations, employers, products and possible responsible parties. Courts may also address which scientific methods and opinions the jury may consider.

Bottar Law's inclusion of toxic tort matters places environmental exposure within its injury practice. The website uses toxic exposure as a named category, while the directory taxonomy matches that work with environmental law and toxic tort claims. The underlying legal focus remains personal harm linked to alleged exposure.

Governmental negligence and wrongful death

A claim involving a public entity may follow procedural rules that differ from an ordinary injury suit. New York law can require an early notice of claim, a hearing or filing within a defined period. The identity of the agency and the nature of the alleged conduct affect the required steps.

The firm states that its public entity work may involve negligence or medical malpractice. A matter could concern an unsafe condition, conduct by a public employee or treatment at a public medical facility. Records requests and agency documents may play a large role in establishing what happened.

Wrongful death claims address losses caused by negligent conduct that results in death. The estate's representative generally brings the legal action, while New York law determines which damages may apply. Medical records, financial documents and evidence about the underlying event help define the claim.

How the legal team is built

Anthony S. Bottar is the managing member, and Michael A. Bottar and Samantha C. Riggi are members. The home page identifies Anthony and Michael Bottar as a father-son legal team. This family connection appears within a roster that also includes senior counsel and of counsel attorneys.

Michael A. Bottar is identified as president of the New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers. The site presents this role as part of his current professional profile. Anthony S. Bottar's managing member title places him in the firm's principal leadership position.

Edward S. Leone holds the title of senior counsel. Hon. Brian F. DeJoseph and Kristy L. Fischmann are listed as of counsel. Those titles give visitors a clear view of each named lawyer's formal relationship with the firm.

In my opinion, the attorney page is most useful when read as a statement of team structure. It identifies six lawyers and assigns a firm title to each one. The published material supports a direct comparison of leadership and counsel roles without relying on promotional labels.

What the published record shows

The website gives a defined account of the firm's identity, history, geographic reach and case categories. It identifies Bottar Law, PLLC as the legal name and places the firm's start of service in 1983. It also describes a plaintiff-side practice tied to severe injury and medical negligence.

The practice descriptions contain useful distinctions within the broader personal injury field. They name the parties who may become involved in workplace claims and identify dangerous products and medications within product cases. They also place negligence and medical malpractice within the firm's public entity work.

The firm's online presence extends beyond its website. Its organization data links to Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter profiles. Those links provide three further published channels associated with Bottar Law, PLLC.

The stated fee arrangement

Bottar Law states that it handles accepted cases on a contingency basis. The word "accepted" matters because the fee arrangement applies after the firm agrees to take a matter. The published description separates the firm's case selection decision from the basis on which an approved case proceeds.

For a prospective client, this is a useful part of the working process described by the firm. It identifies the general fee model at an early stage, alongside the firm's contact information. The statement applies across the accepted matters described in the record rather than assigning different payment structures to individual case categories.