Lever & Ecker, PLLC

Focus and practice areas

A plaintiff's personal injury practice based in New York, this firm has represented injured people since 1994, according to its own site. Lever & Ecker, PLLC runs from a main office in White Plains, in Westchester County, and keeps two more offices in the Bronx and in Ridgewood, Queens. It works on the injured party's side of accident and injury cases.

The matters the firm names cover car, truck, and motorcycle accidents, pedestrian and bicycle accidents, construction accidents, slip and fall cases, brain injuries, medical malpractice, and wrongful death. That is a wide list for a group of four attorneys. In my opinion it reads as a general personal injury practice with a clear plaintiff orientation, built mostly around road and premises accidents.

Personal injury is the through line for all of it. Each of these claims asks the same basic questions in a New York court. Did someone else's conduct cause the harm, and what is that harm worth in money. The firm's whole practice list sits inside that framework.

How the team is built

The firm lists two founding partners, one partner, and one associate. David B. Lever and Daniel G. Ecker founded the firm and still lead it. Adam C. Weiss is also a partner, and Katherine Henderson is an associate attorney.

The founding partners

David B. Lever has represented accident victims in Westchester County since 1990. His practice has stayed on the plaintiff's side and has acted for injured individuals across those years. A career spent entirely representing injured people is worth noting, because many litigators move between plaintiff and defense work over time.

Daniel G. Ecker is a civil litigator and trial attorney. He spent the earlier part of his career at a national defense firm, which gives him a working view of how the other side builds a case. In 2022 he chaired the Trial Lawyers Section of the New York State Bar Association, a role that placed him within the state's trial bar leadership for that year.

The wider team and experience

Adam C. Weiss is a partner at the firm. He was selected to the New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Stars list each year from 2020 through 2026, a third-party rating drawn from peer nomination and review. Katherine Henderson completes the group as an associate attorney.

The firm reports more than 80 years of combined experience among its attorneys. With four lawyers on the roster, that number points to long individual careers inside a small group. Lever's start in 1990 and Ecker's bar section role both sit behind the figure.

The mix of three partners and one associate says something about how a file is likely to be staffed. Senior lawyers make up most of the roster, so a client's case tends to sit with an experienced attorney from the outset. The stated case cap supports that reading, since it keeps each lawyer's active list short.

How the firm handles caseload and fees

One detail on the firm's contact page is worth flagging. The firm states it limits its caseload to 25 to 30 cases per lawyer. That is a specific number, and it gives a prospective client something concrete to weigh.

A capped caseload means each attorney carries a set number of active files at any time. For an injury client, that can shape how quickly a call gets returned and how closely one lawyer follows the file. The firm presents the cap as a deliberate choice about workload per attorney.

Contingency fees

The firm also works on contingency. It collects a fee only if it recovers money for the client, which is the standard arrangement for plaintiff's personal injury work in New York. Under that model the fee comes as an agreed percentage of any recovery.

A contingency structure also affects who can afford to bring a claim. Because the fee depends on recovery, an injured person can pursue a case and pay legal fees only from a result if one comes. That approach is common across plaintiff's injury firms and lowers the up-front cost of hiring counsel.

What these injury cases generally involve

The claims in these areas each follow a familiar path in New York injury law. The notes below describe how such matters generally proceed. They are background about the field, and they carry no claim about the firm's own results.

Road and premises claims

A car or truck accident claim usually starts with proving fault and then documenting medical treatment and lost income. New York's no-fault insurance rules govern much of the early stage, including which medical bills get paid and how soon. A serious injury threshold decides whether a case can move beyond no-fault into a full injury claim.

Premises cases, including slip and fall claims, turn on what the property owner knew. The injured person has to show a hazard existed and that the owner knew about it or should have found it in time. Photographs, incident reports, and witness accounts often settle these cases well before any trial.

Most injury claims in New York settle before trial, often after the exchange of medical records and depositions. A firm's willingness to try a case can still shape settlement value, since insurers weigh the risk of a courtroom loss. Ecker's trial background and bar section role speak to that part of the work.

Higher-stakes and technical claims

Brain injury and wrongful death matters tend to carry the highest stakes and the deepest medical proof. A traumatic brain injury claim leans on treating physicians and, in some cases, life-care planning that estimates future needs. Wrongful death claims in New York are brought by the estate and measure the financial losses to surviving family members.

Medical malpractice sits somewhat apart from the accident work. These claims require expert testimony from qualified physicians and a certificate of merit filed early under New York rules. They tend to run longer and cost more to prepare than a standard car accident file.

Pedestrian and bicycle cases overlap with the road accident work while adding questions about right of way and visibility. Construction accident claims often bring in New York's Labor Law, which sets specific duties for site safety. As a reviewer, I read the firm's list as a connected set of injury claims that lean on much of the same evidence and procedure.

Offices, reach, and what the site shows

Lever & Ecker keeps three offices: White Plains, the Bronx, and Ridgewood in Queens. That footprint covers Westchester County and two New York City boroughs, which matches where much of the region's traffic and construction injury work comes from. The main office sits in White Plains.

White Plains is the Westchester County seat and home to the county's main courthouse, which matters for a firm that files injury suits there. Lever's decades of work in that county suggest steady familiarity with its courts and local practice. The Bronx and Queens offices extend the firm's reach into the neighboring boroughs.

Online presence and gaps in the record

The firm maintains a presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and YouTube, according to its site. For a personal injury practice, active social channels point to an interest in reaching clients through everyday platforms. The site does not list the law schools or admission years for the four attorneys, so a reader who wants those specifics would need to contact the firm.

Read as a whole, the firm's site describes a plaintiff-side injury practice with a stated caseload cap, a contingency fee model, and four named attorneys whose work in the region traces back to 1990 and 1994. In my opinion that combination gives a prospective client a clear sense of who would handle the matter and how the firm structures its work. Lever & Ecker has operated under that name since 1994.